Skip to content

add missing query flags to client status query cli#2246

Merged
crodriguezvega merged 5 commits intomainfrom
carlos/add-missing-tx-query-flags
Sep 12, 2022
Merged

add missing query flags to client status query cli#2246
crodriguezvega merged 5 commits intomainfrom
carlos/add-missing-tx-query-flags

Conversation

@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: #XXXX


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega changed the title add missing tx and query flags to cli add missing query flags to cli Sep 9, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@chatton chatton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just a minor nit

}

flags.AddTxFlagsToCmd(cmd)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nit] unnecessary changes to this file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other commands in the same file had that statement next to the return, so I removed that empty line for consistency. I can revert it, if you want; have no strong preference...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah okay, no it's not a big deal at all!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually kinda like the spaces, a little confusing why we format differently between query.go and tx.go

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega changed the title add missing query flags to cli add missing query flags to client status query cli Sep 9, 2022
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit 2a46942 into main Sep 12, 2022
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the carlos/add-missing-tx-query-flags branch September 12, 2022 08:31
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2022
* add missing tx and query flags to cli

* run gofumpt

* remove adding tx flags

(cherry picked from commit 2a46942)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2022
* add missing tx and query flags to cli

* run gofumpt

* remove adding tx flags

(cherry picked from commit 2a46942)
crodriguezvega added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
* add missing tx and query flags to cli

* run gofumpt

* remove adding tx flags

(cherry picked from commit 2a46942)

Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io>
crodriguezvega added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2022
* add missing tx and query flags to cli

* run gofumpt

* remove adding tx flags

(cherry picked from commit 2a46942)

Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants